Sticks and Stones and the “Secular Left”

—————-
This has been reposted from an email I got, without the Author’s approval.  His text remains unaltered.  Any mistakes in grammer are most likely caused by me during posting.
—————-

Published on Monday, May 23, 2005 by CommonDreams.org
by David Benjamin

At some point since last Novembers elections, a new term—which appears to have seismic connotations—has entered the American political lexicon. I only heard it two weeks ago, from right-wing propagandist Mary Matalin, on “Meet the Press.”

Throughout this session of “Meet the Press,” which included Matalin’s Clintonite husband James Carville, Matalin doggedly established the term “secular Left” as a synonym for “the Democratic Party.” At first, I thought Matalin had just suffered a slip of the tongue. Or maybe she was just being cute. But, she kept saying “secular Left”—more often than “Democrats.” Never once did she describe her ideological foes as either “liberal” or “progressive.”

This emergence of “secular Left” as the Right’s preferred pejorative for both Democrats and liberals is remarkable, if only because it suggests that Republicans and conservatives appear to have absorbed themselves, willingly, into the narrow faction of the “religious Right.” After all, if everyone west of the political center is now the “secular Left,” then everyone right of center must be the “religious Right.”

Posted by Jake Covert on 5/27/2005, terribly early in the morning

Comments

There are no comments yet for this entry.

Add a comment.

Allowed HTML: <a href=""></a>, <u>, <em>, <strike>, <small>, <strong>, <blockquote>. Please use <pre><code> (and closing tags) for any code snippets. Other stuff will not be rendered once submitted.

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: